<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Postmodern Idiosyncrasies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com</link>
	<description>axioms, maxims, platitudes &#38; aphorisms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Monster Hospital by Friend</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2012/02/06/the-monster-hospital/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Friend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1664#comment-651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My kinda hospital.  That is by far and away my favourite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kinda hospital.  That is by far and away my favourite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking Down on Creation… 15 Storeys High by sean</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/08/25/15-storeys-high/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1078#comment-634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brilliiant sitcom. first scene in &quot;model&quot; is the best depiction of a hangover i have ever seen, standing there in his pants, holding a bottle of water and explaining how he got his burnt outh the night before &quot;...in the end i just got a curry&quot;

and then of course the line:
&quot;no, no, the one with the limp is kaiser soze... oh im not going through it again&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliiant sitcom. first scene in &#8220;model&#8221; is the best depiction of a hangover i have ever seen, standing there in his pants, holding a bottle of water and explaining how he got his burnt outh the night before &#8220;&#8230;in the end i just got a curry&#8221;</p>
<p>and then of course the line:<br />
&#8220;no, no, the one with the limp is kaiser soze&#8230; oh im not going through it again&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Knowingly Repetitious… Cerebus: Volume Fifteen – Latter Days by Gene Phillips</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/11/29/cerebus-the-aardvark-latter-days/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene Phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1461#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with most of the above.  When I first attempted to slog through the Cerebexegesis back in the day, I was most annoyed that Sim, through the character of Cerebus (though not divorcing himself from Cerebus as has sometimes been the case), played fast and loose with scriptural translations in order to distance them from any relativistic (specifically Gravesian, IMO) interpretations.  

I never knew why he bothered with so much minutiae, though, given that he created Yoowhoo to take the rap for all the impurities in Scripture. Oh well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the above.  When I first attempted to slog through the Cerebexegesis back in the day, I was most annoyed that Sim, through the character of Cerebus (though not divorcing himself from Cerebus as has sometimes been the case), played fast and loose with scriptural translations in order to distance them from any relativistic (specifically Gravesian, IMO) interpretations.  </p>
<p>I never knew why he bothered with so much minutiae, though, given that he created Yoowhoo to take the rap for all the impurities in Scripture. Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DICOMIDIS COMMA THOM by Laura Dee</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2012/01/01/dicomidis-comma-thom/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1569#comment-551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to read more, write faster..... ring France xx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to read more, write faster&#8230;.. ring France xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Less Diverse, But Better, Than The Tetractys… Cerebus: Volume Ten – Minds by Brian John Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/06/29/cerebus-the-aardvark-minds/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian John Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=880#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the idea of author being surprised by their character&#039;s actions comes from a point where they are writing 7 trying to capture a character accurately.  As shown in this volume, Sim really would like to give Cerebus a happy ending, but feels it&#039;s intellectually dishonest to do so.  At least that&#039;s how I always looked at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea of author being surprised by their character&#8217;s actions comes from a point where they are writing 7 trying to capture a character accurately.  As shown in this volume, Sim really would like to give Cerebus a happy ending, but feels it&#8217;s intellectually dishonest to do so.  At least that&#8217;s how I always looked at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on keep the home fires burning… Torchwood: Miracle Day by Thom Dicomidis</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/07/11/torchwood-miracle-day/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thom Dicomidis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=916#comment-390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The acting in Torchwood has always been all over the place, if only because some of the dialogue they&#039;re given is truly terrible. Eve Myles is fine for the more human scenes but throw her any sci-fi or try to have her play some kind of bad-ass and she just looks uncomfortable and stiff. This was written after the first episode of Miracle Day aired, and frankly it was a fairly steady downward trajectory from there in terms of coherence and competency in drama and storytelling. There was a niche for Torchwood to fill in the Doctor Who universe, but it&#039;s been almost an unmitigated mess for the majority of its time on the air, fettered with juvenile and lazy writing and mistaking melodrama for tension. It&#039;s just sub-par television, and as a proponent for adult science-fiction its damaging in its failings.

I&#039;m not saying you shouldn&#039;t be allowed to enjoy it in spite of its problems, but where Children of Earth managed to be taut, bleak and interesting Miracle Day was a completely wasted premise, and was the worse for following something worthwhile done with the same property.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The acting in Torchwood has always been all over the place, if only because some of the dialogue they&#8217;re given is truly terrible. Eve Myles is fine for the more human scenes but throw her any sci-fi or try to have her play some kind of bad-ass and she just looks uncomfortable and stiff. This was written after the first episode of Miracle Day aired, and frankly it was a fairly steady downward trajectory from there in terms of coherence and competency in drama and storytelling. There was a niche for Torchwood to fill in the Doctor Who universe, but it&#8217;s been almost an unmitigated mess for the majority of its time on the air, fettered with juvenile and lazy writing and mistaking melodrama for tension. It&#8217;s just sub-par television, and as a proponent for adult science-fiction its damaging in its failings.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to enjoy it in spite of its problems, but where Children of Earth managed to be taut, bleak and interesting Miracle Day was a completely wasted premise, and was the worse for following something worthwhile done with the same property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on keep the home fires burning… Torchwood: Miracle Day by backwoodsredneck</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/07/11/torchwood-miracle-day/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[backwoodsredneck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=916#comment-383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Torchwood and I don&#039;t understand what the fuss is. The only thing I find weird are the unnecessary sex scenes, hetro or homosexual. I don&#039;t think they add anything to the storyline, at least the way it&#039;s being presented now. Other than that, the acting is always great. I miss Ianto, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Torchwood and I don&#8217;t understand what the fuss is. The only thing I find weird are the unnecessary sex scenes, hetro or homosexual. I don&#8217;t think they add anything to the storyline, at least the way it&#8217;s being presented now. Other than that, the acting is always great. I miss Ianto, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stealing Sheep: Noah &amp; The Paper Moon (PLUS: LIVE) by Tan Coul</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/10/15/stealing-sheep-noah-and-the-paper-moon/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan Coul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1312#comment-382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw the Sheep in Wrexham on the 6th and was equally blown away - amazing sound and they just seemed to be having so much fun...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the Sheep in Wrexham on the 6th and was equally blown away &#8211; amazing sound and they just seemed to be having so much fun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are a lot of laughs in Lars von Trier&#8217;s ‘Melancholia’… by David H. Schleicher</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/10/09/lars-von-trier-melancholia/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Schleicher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1292#comment-375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thom - I agree with what you say about Dunst - I thought it was refreshing she didn&#039;t resort to histrionics, and I thought there was such &quot;texture&quot; to her performance - it really was something else entirely that I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen.

I find it interesting what you say about Gainsbourg (I recall her being similar in 21 Grams) and you are right on about Kiefer (and I would give the same regard to A. Skarsgard). 

I found it interesting how Von Trier projected parts of himself not only onto the two sisters, but also Kiefer&#039;s character and Cameron Spurr&#039;s character as well.  At least that&#039;s how I read into it.  There was a little bit of him everywhere I guess...maybe even in the horse Abraham (ha!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thom &#8211; I agree with what you say about Dunst &#8211; I thought it was refreshing she didn&#8217;t resort to histrionics, and I thought there was such &#8220;texture&#8221; to her performance &#8211; it really was something else entirely that I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p>I find it interesting what you say about Gainsbourg (I recall her being similar in 21 Grams) and you are right on about Kiefer (and I would give the same regard to A. Skarsgard). </p>
<p>I found it interesting how Von Trier projected parts of himself not only onto the two sisters, but also Kiefer&#8217;s character and Cameron Spurr&#8217;s character as well.  At least that&#8217;s how I read into it.  There was a little bit of him everywhere I guess&#8230;maybe even in the horse Abraham (ha!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are a lot of laughs in Lars von Trier&#8217;s ‘Melancholia’… by Thom Dicomidis</title>
		<link>http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/2011/10/09/lars-von-trier-melancholia/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thom Dicomidis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://postmodernidiosyncrasies.com/?p=1292#comment-374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was genuinely surprised by how well Kirsten Dunst managed to portray a depression and despair of that magnitude, which I&#039;ve found is usually treated as either more histrionic or, much worse, tied into a hackneyed myth about some noble creative force arising from depression. Some of the early scenes in the second part of the film nearly broke my heart, seeing someone so nakedly (no pun intended) broken and helpless, and how in regaining some sense of self she has to retread a whole life; the way she deals with the meatloaf and then the spread she&#039;s eating with her fingers straight from the jar being of particular significance in her rapid re-maturation. Even by the end of the film she&#039;s still more a teenager than the woman of the first part, nihilistic and cruel to her sister but more playful and selfless with her nephew.

With all that in mind I&#039;d like to say that I think Charlotte Gainsbourg had the harder role, or at least the more thankless, since her transition was from fussing sister and de facto matriarch to that of a neurotic forcing down the clearly consanguineous trend to illness in order to protect both her son and her sister and so as not to fail a husband who so completely fails her. It&#039;s hard to judge as a performance since I&#039;ve yet to see anything in which I&#039;d say Gainsbourg acts rather than inhabits a character, if you&#039;ll excuse a perilous lean towards pretension. Kirsten Dunst plays Justine extremely well, but she will always, to some extent, be Kirsten Dunst. Charlotte Gainsbourg *is* Claire, for the duration of the film, though I&#039;d love to see her in some more overt genre-roles to find out if that would hold true for more outré characters. (I can&#039;t bring myself to watch &#039;Antichrist&#039;, I&#039;ve tried but my internal cringe set in right at the start, knowing what was to come.) 

Even Kiefer Sutherland, with whom I found there was something of a hump in terms of disconnecting him from his gruff &#039;24&#039; persona, was genuinely impressive, walking quite a fine line between threatening and ineffectual, which I think was needed to sell both his dismissive certainty about Melancholia and his eventual reaction to their fate. He was also much funnier than I might have expected, his reaction to Justine reflecting on the patterns of his relationship with his mother-in-law being a particular gem.

Sorry, I seem to have digressed into essay, so let it suffice that I couldn&#039;t think more highly of the supporting cast, and was sorry that there wasn&#039;t more done with them... many thanks for your kind comments.

Thom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was genuinely surprised by how well Kirsten Dunst managed to portray a depression and despair of that magnitude, which I&#8217;ve found is usually treated as either more histrionic or, much worse, tied into a hackneyed myth about some noble creative force arising from depression. Some of the early scenes in the second part of the film nearly broke my heart, seeing someone so nakedly (no pun intended) broken and helpless, and how in regaining some sense of self she has to retread a whole life; the way she deals with the meatloaf and then the spread she&#8217;s eating with her fingers straight from the jar being of particular significance in her rapid re-maturation. Even by the end of the film she&#8217;s still more a teenager than the woman of the first part, nihilistic and cruel to her sister but more playful and selfless with her nephew.</p>
<p>With all that in mind I&#8217;d like to say that I think Charlotte Gainsbourg had the harder role, or at least the more thankless, since her transition was from fussing sister and de facto matriarch to that of a neurotic forcing down the clearly consanguineous trend to illness in order to protect both her son and her sister and so as not to fail a husband who so completely fails her. It&#8217;s hard to judge as a performance since I&#8217;ve yet to see anything in which I&#8217;d say Gainsbourg acts rather than inhabits a character, if you&#8217;ll excuse a perilous lean towards pretension. Kirsten Dunst plays Justine extremely well, but she will always, to some extent, be Kirsten Dunst. Charlotte Gainsbourg *is* Claire, for the duration of the film, though I&#8217;d love to see her in some more overt genre-roles to find out if that would hold true for more outré characters. (I can&#8217;t bring myself to watch &#8216;Antichrist&#8217;, I&#8217;ve tried but my internal cringe set in right at the start, knowing what was to come.) </p>
<p>Even Kiefer Sutherland, with whom I found there was something of a hump in terms of disconnecting him from his gruff &#8217;24&#8242; persona, was genuinely impressive, walking quite a fine line between threatening and ineffectual, which I think was needed to sell both his dismissive certainty about Melancholia and his eventual reaction to their fate. He was also much funnier than I might have expected, his reaction to Justine reflecting on the patterns of his relationship with his mother-in-law being a particular gem.</p>
<p>Sorry, I seem to have digressed into essay, so let it suffice that I couldn&#8217;t think more highly of the supporting cast, and was sorry that there wasn&#8217;t more done with them&#8230; many thanks for your kind comments.</p>
<p>Thom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

